Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Blogs Forums Photos Calendar

Speak Up! Memphis

Bill Bans Obese Patrons From Mississippi Restaurants

Three Mississippi lawmakers sponsored a bill this week that would make it illegal for restaurants to serve the obese.

The lawmakers who sponsored Bill No. 282 say they're not trying to discriminate against the overweight in Mississippi, they're trying to start a dialogue about how to fight the problem of obesity in the Magnolia State.

The proposed law would make it illegal for state-licensed restaurants to serve food to the obese.

Critics say government shouldn't try to be the food police and they say this latest attempt at public health legislation leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

"What kind of crap is that?" asks James Kelley of Clarksdale, Mississippi.  "What do I think about it?  Leave people alone.  Let them eat what they want.  Let them be."

Dedra Holley from Robinsonville, agrees.  "How can you be serious?" she says.  "So if they discriminate against obese people who are they going to discriminate against after that?  People with long hair?  Short hair?  White people?  Black people?  I mean, that's absurd."

You'd be hard-pressed to find any Mississippian who supports the idea.  Even the man who sponsored the bill, Representative Ted Mayhall, says it should never pass.

"I do not have any intention of this becoming law," says the Desoto County Republican.  "I don't think it has a Chinaman's chance.  I'm against intrusive government.  I don't think that's what we're here for and what we should be doing."

So why draft such controversial legislation?

"The reason I put the bill in," says Mayhall, "was to call attention to the seriousness of the obesity epidemic in Mississippi."

Mayhall says 30-percent of adults in Mississippi are obese.  The state ranks number one in the nation for obesity three years running.

And with Mississippi's Medicaid program $168 million dollars in the red this year,  Rep. Mayhall says illnesses related to obesity, including diabetes, are draining the state's budget.

His efforts to raise awareness about the issue have the national media calling with questions and constituents calling him out.   By noon Friday, his answering machine was flooded with some not-so-nice messages and his cell phone was ringing constantly.

One caller told him, "Why don't you move to China or Russia instead of the U.S.  Last I heard, this was still a free country."

There are plenty of skeptics who say Mayhall's plan to spark a change in the eating habits of Mississippians won't work.

"I don't think it's going to put a dent in the whole problem," says Dedra Holley.  "I just can't believe it will."

"You're not going to be able to force someone to do something they're not ready to do," says James Kelley of Southaven.  "Is this a Communist state?"

Despite the verbal attacks and all the doubters, Mayhall, a 68 year-old former pharmaceutical rep, says he's determined to stir up the debate.

"I'm a big boy," he says.  "I can take anything that comes.  I don't care.   If it'll save three or four lives, it's well worth it."

Before Mayhall and Representatives John Read and Bobby Shows introduced their legislation, they got the green light from Mississippi’s Public Health chairman and from Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour.

No one expects the bill to pass.  They do expect a lively discussion in subcommittee about ways the state can solve its' obesity problems.

It's your turn to Speak Up! Memphis.

Published Monday, February 04, 2008 8:33 AM by smyers

Comments

 

mstawan said:

I think this is ridiculious that is discrimination against people.
February 4, 2008 10:31 AM
 

deb said:

its sad, this only makes it harder for people who are obese to go out.  When your obese you stay home so people don't make fun of you, limiting yourself and making it easier to gain weight.   People who are overweight tend to gain on less food, and the cycle is vicious.  this kind of thing will only make eating disorders so much worse.  rewarding those who abuse their bodies and starve themselves or purge.  How about education, medical intervention with insurance coverage and getting rid of fast food restaurants.  kindess and understanding will go much farther than telling people they are fat and must leave the restaurant.  Is just so sad, lawmakers aren't doing much at all except for making it harder for kids at schools who are obese.  they will be made fun of so much worse than before.
February 4, 2008 10:35 AM
 

GregWilson said:

When I think about  this it sounds more and more like Germany between 1936 and 1945 during the rise and fall of Hitler.  The politicians that came with this lunacy need to ran out on a rail.
February 4, 2008 11:23 AM
 

DebT said:

How are they going to know who are Mississippians? The only way I know is to look at their driver licenses. Some obese people will have to weigh & the restaurants would have to have the weight range that's normal. It's too much for restaurants. To even have put in a bill like this is irresponsible.
February 4, 2008 11:54 AM
 

Dover said:

What’s next? Restaurant employees will be told to tie skinny people to a chair and force feed them french fries and cream pies until they gain 5 lbs? Lawmakers need to focus on laws against criminals and stop concerning themselves with fat!
February 4, 2008 11:55 AM
 

ServeMePlz said:

This is a LAWSUIT waiting to happen.
What idiots........
February 4, 2008 12:39 PM
 

bob said:

ABC24 and Joyce Peterson should be ashamed of themselves for making this story sound like the Bill has already been passed.

It says right in the article "Proposed Law" so why does the headline say, "Bill Bans Obese Patrons..."

This article was written for shock value.    They knew that people wouldn't read or understand the entire picture.  
I copy part of the article below that showed me that this entire article was a waste of time.  ""I do not have any intention of this becoming law," says the Desoto County Republican.  "I don't think it has a Chinaman's chance.  I'm against intrusive government.  I don't think that's what we're here for and what we should be doing.” The reason I put the bill in," says Mayhall, "was to call attention to the seriousness of the obesity epidemic in Mississippi.""

The true core of this story is that Representative Ted Mayhall is completely incompetent as a lawmaker.  
1.  He is wasting time proposing pointless bills that don't have a snowballs chance in hell.
2. Did anybody catch that he used the term Chinaman?  Isn't that as offensive to Asians as the N word is to our locals?

Shame on you Joyce.  This type of "reporting" will get you a coveted spot on FOX13.
February 4, 2008 1:13 PM
 

AMBER85 said:

Atleast its not expected to pass only to raise awareness that it is a problem.  Maybe the restraunts should take a stand and offer less food and smaller prices.  A lot of ppl are raised that a clean plate is a happy plate therefore overeating and that causes obesity.  I know when I go out I sometimes find myself trying to eat everything not wanting to let it go to waste and waste my money.  They say portion size is a good start to losing weight a long wit healthy eating and exercise!
February 4, 2008 1:15 PM
 

CLM said:

Okay - to make a comment as equally stupid as this story ...

This will NEVER happen. We all know MS is full of a bunch of fata$$ people and restaurants would lose money big time if they kept all of the fat people out. THAT will never happen.

If anything, employeers should have health programs for employees and also charge more for health care for folks who make poor health choices.  
February 4, 2008 1:22 PM
 

E.O.O. said:

Instead of calling people fat,people need to be worried about all the freedoms they have lost in the past 5 yrs alone.We've lost more than in the history of the country itself.Granted,they are small in nature but I see a snowball effect coming.
Obesity
Smoking
Seatbelts
Transfats
Emanate Domain
Just to name a few.
It is not the governments job to do this.
Go to youtube and put Ron Paul and the NAU in the search
No I'm not a Ron Paul freak.
Just listen to his answer when he is asked about the NAU.
So if you ask me are we slowly losing our Freedoms.You bet your fat rear we are!
February 4, 2008 1:43 PM
 

ODA said:

I am overweight, and if I went to a restaurant and they informed me I could not eat there, all it would do would be make me depressed, and then I'd go home and eat a gallon of ice cream...this is not going to help in any way.
February 4, 2008 9:30 PM
 

shelia east said:

So they are going to let some snotty nosed 16 year old kid at McDonalds decide if you can have a burger or not?? There is something wrong with that. Who is going to be the "who's too big to eat here" person. Are they going to measure BMI at the door, kind of like a cover charge?? And if you told someone their child is too fat for you to serve, who is going to handle the fight that brings on?? If they really care about people, make a law that makes these places reduce serving sizes back to healthy sizes. No more super sized meals. Most people don't realize what a normal size meal is anymore. 4 oz. of steak on a plate just doesn't look like its worth $10. The already fat people didn't get there by eating regular portion sizes.  
February 4, 2008 11:55 PM
 

Catgirl said:

Bottom line? It is up to the individual to be responsible for their eating habits. One of the biggest deepest roots of many problems is LACK of personal responsibility for our individual actions.

The government shouldn't HAVE to even bring up stuff like this, but hey, so many Americans are acting like irresponsible, childish brats that something has got to give.

When people overeat, under exercise, and become obese and need more medical care because of obesity related problems, it costs ALL of us. It is a drain on Medicare/Tenncare/whatever care, and in the end? It's coming out of my pocket, your pocket, everyone's pocket.

I too was overweight at one time. I put myself on a "diet," began to exercise, and so far have kept the weight off two years. I still eat WHATEVER I want- just in moderation. It is NOT the restaurants job to control the portion size. It is MINE and MINE ALONE. They didn't come to my house, hold me at gunpoint, force me to go that restaurant, and MAKE me clean my plate. I DID THAT. Noone else. Ask for a to go box people.

I don't agree with this bill either, but hey, doing something about the problem is better than nothing.
February 5, 2008 9:12 AM
 

bthatch said:

I don't believe that keeping obese people from restuarants will help, but he does have a point about making people more aware of the obese problem, and I am certainly tired of paying for other peoples problems, such as tax payers fitting the bill for obese persons health bills, when I can hardly afford to pay to keep insurance for my own family. If you want to continue being obese, don't make tax payers pay for your health problems.
February 5, 2008 5:05 PM
 

J said:

THATS THE MOST STUPIDEST THING I'VE EVER HEARD....................... IT'S TERRIBLE BECAUSE ARE OBESE PEOPLE BOTHERING YOU? SO WHY BOTHER THEM! DO WE FORCE ANNOREXICS TO EAT? NO SO LEAVE IT ALONE
February 5, 2008 6:45 PM
 

lorilee said:

They came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up."
Martin Niemöller

Don't forget what happens when we start singling each other out!!

February 5, 2008 9:21 PM
 

superpablo said:

Maybe they should ban what the industries are putting in the food and animals.  Has anyone ever considered why people that come to the United States become obese, or why their health becomes worse?  Is it what we eat or how much we eat?  Gene manipulated produce, chemicals to make the animals bigger, fat, and grow faster so the industries can make more money?  Look into that.  Study other countries and copy what they are doing good.  Learn from experience.
February 6, 2008 12:44 AM
 

Ty said:

Well the restaurant industry in Mississippi is going to suffer a major blow, BECAUSE EVERYONE IN MISSISSIPPI IS OBESE.
February 6, 2008 8:42 AM
 

GrannyG said:

"So if they discriminate against obese people who are they going to discriminate against after that?  People with long hair?  Short hair?  White people?  Black people?  I mean, that's absurd."  READ THIS STATEMENT.  This is already happening in America, folks, look at the way smokers have been demonized by the "concerned" public and legislators.  She's right, who's next?  Maybe YOU.
February 6, 2008 8:46 AM
 

Catgirl said:

Well, I can agree with the laws regarding smoking. It's one thing for you to kill yourself with your cancer sticks, but another to kill me simply because I'm forced to breath your nicotine/carcinogen (cancer causing agents) filled air.

If second hand smoke related illness/disease wasn't an issue, these laws wouldn't be necessary.

But when people are not considerate with their smoking and it is harmful to others, then something must be done to help them be more considerate.

Besides- smoking is not something you MUST do in order to live.
February 6, 2008 8:52 AM
 

Catgirl said:

Well, I can agree with the laws regarding smoking. It's one thing for you to kill yourself with your cancer sticks, but another to kill me simply because I'm forced to breath your nicotine/carcinogen (cancer causing agents) filled air.

If second hand smoke related illness/disease wasn't an issue, these laws wouldn't be necessary.

But when people are not considerate with their smoking and it is harmful to others, then something must be done to help them be more considerate.

Besides- smoking is not something you MUST do in order to live.
February 6, 2008 8:53 AM
 

mnshadow53 said:


The saddest thing about this proposed bill is the waste of time and resources to propose it.  If the lawmakers who sponsored Bill No. 282 say they're not trying to discriminate against the overweight in Mississippi, they're trying to start a dialogue about how to fight the problem of obesity in the Magnolia State; there are surely better ways to do it than sponsor a bill with absolutely no chance of passing.  
February 6, 2008 11:21 AM
 

mnshadow53 said:


The saddest thing about this proposed bill is the waste of time and resources to propose it.  If the lawmakers who sponsored Bill No. 282 say they're not trying to discriminate against the overweight in Mississippi, they're trying to start a dialogue about how to fight the problem of obesity in the Magnolia State; there are surely better ways to do it than sponsor a bill with absolutely no chance of passing.  
February 6, 2008 11:21 AM
 

Catgirl said:

Sometimes it takes drastic measures to get people to wake up and smell the coffee.

I was watching Oprah on Monday. A doctor said that people just aren't paying attention to the obesity epidemic. They just aren't taking it seriously.

We are a society that likes "shock and awe" tactics, right? Well, maybe this crazy bill is just that. A tactic to get people stirred up so they'll DO something.
February 6, 2008 11:28 AM
 

teddybear0708 said:

This bill is just a straw in the pile! The smoking ban is the exact same thing. Smoke has nothing to do with the issue, the issue is PERSONAL RIGHTS!!!!The government should not be telling me what I can and can not do. And it should not have the right to tell bar and restuarant owners how to run their business. You may not like the smoke in a bar, but you can choose whether or not you will go into that bar. Only the bar owner should make the decision about being smoke free or not. We as a Americans need toband together, stand up, and tell government to give back the freedoms we have already lost, and stay out of our business!!!
February 6, 2008 2:14 PM
 

Catgirl said:

Ah. Personal rights.

Now, let's see if I understand. YOU have the personal right to smoke wherever YOU want, and if I don't like it, I just don't go where YOU are? Don't you see that as a loss of MY personal right? I can't go where I might like to, because YOU are smoking your cancer sticks?

Your rights end where mine begin. I have the right to breathe smoke free air. You have the right to smoke. Both of us can't have our way at the same time. So... to be fair? Public places are smoke free, protecting those who don't want to breathe that crap. Or wait, should I wear a filter mask to remove the air that you are polluting? Is that fair to me?

They are not telling you that you can't smoke. They are forcing you to be more considerate towards others right to breathe clean air when in public places.

I could CARE LESS if you smoke in your car or your house. Choke on your smoke. Die from lung cancer. No skin off my nose. Your choice. BUT... when you cause me to get sick, I DO care. When you cause innocent children to breathe your smoke, raising their risk of asthma and ear infections, when all they want to do is eat dinner, then I DO care.

The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one. We need to be allowed to breathe clean air. SMOKING is not something you HAVE TO DO to live. If you don't smoke, you WON'T die.
February 6, 2008 2:27 PM
 

mnshadow53 said:

You know, my being fat does not infringe on your personal rights.  If I overeat to the point where I explode, the worse that might happen to you is you will get covered with some fat that you can wash off.  However, if I, on the other hand, have to breathe your second hand smoke, it could kill me.  That is the difference between smokers and fat people.  
February 6, 2008 10:09 PM
 

Catgirl said:

Shadow- that put such a funny pic in my head of you exploding (not that I want you to explode).

I don't think that by proposing this bill that anyone was trying to take away personal rights to eat. I think that the lawmakers are simply trying to draw attention to the problem that is obesity. Because it is a problem. We are literally eating ourselves to death.

It would be different if we didn't have scientific evidence that being obese contributed to other bad things like diabetes, heart problems, etc. We DO have that evidence, yet people are ignoring it. I liken it to people acting like spoiled children and our government is being put in the role of parent. That was NOT the purpose of the government, but by our collective refusal to take responsibility for ourselves, we, in a way, are forcing their hand.

At this rate, if something is not done, we will all be sick/dead. And who is going to go in the military to protect us? Our children are all growing up FAT.  

Something's gotta give. This law won't pass, but maybe it will stimulate some interest/decision making by the American people to help themselves. THAT is the reasoning behind this bill- in my opinion.
February 7, 2008 9:05 AM
 

mnshadow53 said:

LOL Catgirl.....glad to inject a little levity.  You are right; obesity is a horrific problem, and one that must be addressed.  If the sponsors of this bill wanted to start people talking, they succeeded; however, I still think they could have made better use of their state's legislative resources than to sponsor a sham bill that they really didn't want to pass.  Perhaps nutrition education programs in the schools would have been better or mandatory nutritional education programs for recipients of federal/state aid like Medicare/Medicaid and AFDC.
February 7, 2008 12:45 PM
 

Catgirl said:

Ooh... I like those ideas.

You know BCBS already offers incentives for healthy lifestyles, but I wonder how many people take them up on it...

And I know at our clinic we offer classes for diabetics, but you'd be surprised at how many people don't take advantage of them. There also also free community forums with recipes, etc. Never a full room or even half a room.

Bottom line? I see this as a hail mary pass. Too bad for the resources wasted, certainly. But, if everyone were as logical as us, this wouldn't even be a topic on this blog page, right? lol... (joke, people, joke)
February 7, 2008 12:58 PM
 

Catgirl said:

I have been thinking about something since yesterday. The government can't win. American's are never satisfied.

We don't want the government taking away our personal rights. Yet... when we choose to exercise those rights and then pay the consequences, we expect the government to bail us out.

Examples-

Smokers want to smoke everywhere, but when they get lung cancer they want to be cured. If they don't have health care, they expect the government to provide it. Though there is a warning on each package from the Surgeon General, they still proclaim not to know that there is a risk of lung cancer.

FEMA. Now. I have always had a problem with this scenario- you live in an area where hurricanes occur frequently. You don't keep provisions on hand, just in case. When the National Weather Service and other agencies tell you a hurricane is coming you STILL don't go to the store for provisions. But after the storm rolls through, you pull your hair and gnash your teeth because someone (Big Daddy Government, maybe) is taking too long to bring you water, ice, etc.

Women who get pregnant, don't finish school, and get government assistance to pay for your housing, food, etc. You are told what causes pregnancy. You know how to prevent it. (Pretending this is not true is no good- kids are growing up faster today than ever before) You choose not to prevent it, and you get pregnant. Noone can tell YOU what to do after all, YOU'RE GROWN. Well, guess what? When you pay the consequences for those "grown up" decisions, you expect Daddy Government to take care of you with welfare checks, food stamps, Tenncare, and public housing.

Is it only me that sees the contradictions here? We want to be able to do whatever we WANT to do, regardless of the consequences. No government interference or infringing on our personal rights (to be stupid). But whenever something bad happens and we reap what we sow, we want Daddy Government to step in and take care of us.

Sounds to me like Americans are a bunch of spoiled rotten, ungrateful teenagers who need their butts spanked. I miss the days when people took personal responsibility for themselves.
February 8, 2008 9:05 AM
 

mnshadow53 said:

You are so right Catgirl.....there is no personal responsibility anymore because there are no consequences for our actions.  

When I was very young, my 1st husband was a volunteer fireman.  There was a family who always refused to evacuate from the little island they lived on, just off the mainland, when the weather was bad.  One year, three volunteer firemen took off in a boat to; once again, rescue these morons when it got too dangerous for them to attempt to leave on their own.  Their boat capsized and they all drowned.  The fire chief refused to allow any more firemen to attempt rescues of these idiots ever again unless they evacuated when they were told to do so.  The idiots sued AND WON.  Can you believe that?  

That is the way this society goes.  We never accept responsibility for our actions, but always expect someone else to clean up our messes.  Unless that public mindset changes, it will never get better.  
February 8, 2008 9:14 AM
 

Mrwhitey said:

mnshadow53 , dang, how many husbands have you had? Or shall I ask how many does it take?
February 8, 2008 5:17 PM
 

mnshadow53 said:

LOL Mr. Whitey, I have had 156 husbands....want to my 157th?
February 9, 2008 5:29 PM
 

MrsWhitey said:

Dang
February 10, 2008 4:08 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<February 2008>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728291
2345678

Syndication

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.